What's the Best Digital Voice Recorder to use with Dragon NaturallySpeaking 10
Submitted by Anthony427 on Fri, 12/19/2008 - 22:26.
I'm in the market to pick up the new digital voice recorder and would like to hear what other people have to say about their recorders.
What kind of problems they've had or how well they like their recorders, and why.
It would be nice to find one with a large easy to read display & also easy to use buttons. Most of these recorders are very small. I'm old-fashioned would like to find something on the larger size.
The recorder would be used to pick up dictation in a classroom, at home & recording live speech audio from the Web if possible.
Anybody's input would be greatly appreciated.
Merry Christmas and a Happy & Prosperous New Year to everyone!
Anthony427
»
- Anthony427's blog
- Login or register to post comments

Can you clarify how you
Can you clarify how you expect to use the recorder and its recordings? I ask because using DNS to transcribe the recordings you describe from multiple sources is not likely to be successful, so there's no particular reason to limit yourself to just digital recorders. But if you intend to transcribe your own voice recordings, that's a different, and more feasible, goal.
Bruce
Hello Bruce
I would be using this to record for 1 four our class. I wanted to change this into text so it would be easier for me to look up the subject matter at a later date. Most of the recording would be of my own voice. Taking short notes. I'd also like to be able to record podcast subject matter for later references, if possible.
Thanks
Anthony427
Quote: The recorder would
The recorder would be used to pick up dictation in a classroom, at home & recording live speech audio from the Web if possible.
Anthony,
Back before I left ScanSoft in January of 2002, I was responsible for establishing protocols for digital voice recorders. One of the things that I reported to QA and development was that there were a lot of things that you could do with a digital voice recorder that were not publicly discussed, but for good reason. L&H/ScanSoft/Nuance technical support obviously does not want to endorse some of these procedures and capabilities.
However, as regards what you want to use the recorder for, in the words of us New Yorkers, fagetaboutit !!!:jawdrop:
Unfortunately, although there are ways of using DNS to transcribe multiple speakers, there are basic things that go without saying.
1. Lectures, conversational speech, non-structured speech, conferences, meetings, etc. all involve the type of speech that is not well suited to recording using a DVR (Digital Voice Recorder). Crosstalk and over talking, as well as the type of conversational speech that is involved in these types of environments are not likely to produce anything better than 5% to 10% accuracy. Speech recognition is simply not designed to handle these types of speech environments, even though the latest versions of DNS (9.5-10.0) do come with speaker independent Acoustic Model (Skip initial training for this user – DNS 9.5 and selecting "None" when creating a new user in DNS 10.0). These speaker independent Acoustic Model's still require that the speech being transcribed is structured and not conversational. You can test this very easily by simply talking to DNS the same way that you would talk to somebody in a normal standard conversation with all of the various slang and colloquialisms. You'll find out very quickly that the results end up being mostly garbage. So, using a digital voice recorder for this purpose is not going to net you results worth spending the money for a good DVR. Under these conditions, you're better off doing what is called Echo dictating. Echo dictating is basically listening to a recording and then dictating what you hear using your own user profile. The amount of time and effort required to correct inaccurate recordings of lectures and the like will take you twice as long as echo dictating would take. Bottom line: It won't work. It is virtually impossible to structure these types of environments in a manner that would be conducive to transcribing via DNS and a DVR.
2. Recording any type of external source requires that the clarity be high, the speech be structured, and the volume be optimal without a lot of background noise, cross talking, multiple speakers speaking at the same time, or, what I call, the canyon effect (i.e., your recordings sounding like you're talking in a canyon). But all of these factors together and you get very poor results.
3. When using a digital voice recorder for recording any external source for transcription, you cannot use the automatic voice activation feature because this will cause dropouts (i.e., sections of your dictation that will be missing parts of what is being recorded). In addition, you cannot use the conference setting because using this type of setting on a digital voice recorder amplifies the input to the microphone. The problem here is that it also amplifies everything else, including fans, people talking around you, people talking across the room, etc., etc. ad infinitum. This is anathema to transcribing any recordings made under this condition.
4. On the other hand, if you're going to use a DVR professionally to record your own personal dictation for transcription, then the expense of purchasing a good digital voice recorder may be justifiable. Otherwise, the only recommendation that I can give you is to use a reasonably good recorder that gives you clear reproduction of that which you are recording so that you can use the echo dictation technique. It's not worth spending $500-$800 on a digital voice recorder under the conditions that you specify.
Chuck Runquist
Former Dragon NaturallySpeaking SDK & Senior Technical Solutions PM for DNS for Lernout & Hauspie (L&H)
"Some have taken authority as the truth, rather than truth as the authority." -- Gerald Massey
Hello Chuck
Hello Chuck
I'd only be using this recorder for one class. It's for a four-hour beginners class on how to use eBay for posting writing descriptive text, pictures etc. The reason I'd like to record this class and transcribe it into text, is so I could easily find the subject matters and review them at a later date without having to search through a full recording.
Most of the recording would be of my own dictation for short note's. I would also like to be able to record voices from online podcast if possible. But I see that you say, this is almost impossible because of the background sounds.
I had called nuances sales representative and asked them for their suggestions on the best recorder for my needs. They gave me the following options. I would like to hear your views on these.
The Philips 660 looks like it would work as far as the display and buttons are concerned, but it doesn't come with any software, and I'm not sure how this would work with Dragon NaturallySpeaking 10 preferred.
Sony icd-mx20
Olymtus ds-2
Phillips 660
Thanks
Anthony427
Lunis Orcutt -- KnownBrainer thanks for your suggestions
Your suggestions are great and all of these recorders look superb. I'm not even sure what DS2 is or what it does. The price is a little steep for what I'd like to pay at the present time. I'm looking for a recorder that has large buttons and a large easy to read display. All of these recorders seem to have a nice display although it's hard to tell by looking at a picture as to the size of the buttons etc.
I also see that these links are connected directly to your site. Nice publishing technique.
Anthony427
I'm not sure but DS-2 sounds
I'm not sure but DS-2 sounds like an algorithm, i.e., a set of formulae and/or associated programs for compressing/expanding the audio data.
Bruce
BruceCyr wrote:I'm not
I'm not sure but DS-2 sounds like an algorithm, i.e., a set of formulae and/or associated programs for compressing/expanding the audio data.
Bruce
Bruce et al.,
DS2 is a proprietary soundfile format for digital recorders that has been designed first by Philips, then has been adapted into Olympus devices, and later on has come into use by Philips devices also, like e.g. in the Philips DPM 9600.
The format itself does have a lot of advantages over the previous common DSS format for digital recorders, as far as speech recognition is concerned, in terms of accuracy.
So, in case you have any interest in using a digital recorder along with SR, this feature is something that should definitely be taken into consideration.
Rüdiger
rwilke wrote: BruceCyr
I'm not sure but DS-2 sounds like an algorithm, i.e., a set of formulae and/or associated programs for compressing/expanding the audio data.
Bruce
Bruce et al.,
DS2 is a proprietary soundfile format for digital recorders
...
Rüdiger
Yah, I should have said that the algorithm, or codec, is the set of mathematical transformations (and associated programming algorithms) performed on the sound source to produce the formatted file. (An associated decodec is a set or inverse formulae/algoritms which reproduce the original sound source from the formatted file.) Here mathematical function and form are the same thing, although there can be multiple programming algorithms mapping to the same formulae/format.
Bruce
BruceCyr wrote: rwilke
I'm not sure but DS-2 sounds like an algorithm, i.e., a set of formulae and/or associated programs for compressing/expanding the audio data.
Bruce
Bruce et al.,
DS2 is a proprietary soundfile format for digital recorders
...
Rüdiger
Yah, I should have said that the algorithm, or codec, is the set of mathematical transformations (and associated programming algorithms) performed on the sound source to produce the formatted file. (An associated decodec is a set or inverse formulae/algoritms which reproduce the original sound source from the formatted file.) Here mathematical function and form are the same thing, although there can be multiple programming algorithms mapping to the same formulae/format.
Bruce
Thanks for the technical info on this. My intention, however, was to point out that using a digital recorder that takes advantage of the new DS2 standard, you can double your efficiency, on a rough estimation, as compared to the older ones that can only use the DSS standard.
And this, I presume, must have been the motivation for what Lunis recommended.
Rüdiger
rwilke wrote: [with] the
[with] the new DS2 standard, you can double your efficiency
Rüdiger
Rüdiger,
You mean you can skip every other word while dictating yet still get full text transcription :-)
Or do you have in mind some less obvious kind of efficiency?
Thanks,
Bruce
BruceCyr wrote: You mean
You mean you can skip every other word while dictating yet still get full text transcription?
Bruce,
not exactly, but the concept seems quite promising.
What I meant to say, however, is that you get only half as many mistakes, on a very rough estimation, so your efficiency seems to double in effect.
Thanks for giving me a chance to make myself clear.
Rüdiger
DSS and DS2 are unique in
DSS and DS2 are unique in that they are patented audio compression algorithms. DS2 has an improved compression algorithm that enhances accuracy in DNS transcription when using recorders that support this audio compression format by enhancing compression without losing audio quality on conversions.
Chuck Runquist
Former Dragon NaturallySpeaking SDK & Senior Technical Solutions PM for DNS
If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee - that will do them in. - Bradley's Bromide
"That-which-should-not-be-named" wrote: It is
It is understanding that Olympus created and owns the patents on DSS and DS2 algorithms even though Philips first introduced this technology in the Philips 9600. We believe that Olympus licenses the technology to Philips.
Sorry for mixing this up.
Rüdiger Wilke
"That-which-should-not-be-named" wrote: Quote:
DS2 is a proprietary soundfile format for digital recorders that has been designed first by Philips
It is understanding that Olympus created and owns the patents on DSS and DS2 algorithms even though Philips first introduced this technology in the Philips 9600. We believe that Olympus licenses the technology to Philips.
Lunis,
That's not correct the first DSS standard was first distributed by Olympus with the Olympus DS1 back in 1998. The Olympus DS1 was bundled with L&H VoiceXpress. I still have mine.
Chuck Runquist
Former Dragon NaturallySpeaking SDK & Senior Technical Solutions PM for DNS
If computers get too powerful, we can organize them into a committee - that will do them in. - Bradley's Bromide
converting DSS files to Mp3 and Medical Dragon
now that you have explained the reason for these non-mp3 formatted files on a digital recorder, I was wondering if there is a way to convert them to an mp3 for easy transfer to my ipod?
also, is one better for Dragon medical 10 or preferred by docs?
thanks,
tivski
Recorder for dns
It seems to be the consensus that DVRs don't work very well - are there other types of recorders besides dvrs that might work?